Railway Engineering / Indonesia
EXPLORE CBP
EXPLORE CBP
01 / SOLUTIONS
Find a solution
02 / TECHNOLOGY
Find a principal
03 / PROJECTS & DELIVERY
See our work
04 / COMPANY
Know CBP
Loading…
Each family groups products that solve the same operating job. The principal and model come after the problem is clear.
Know the condition before intervention.
Prove performance before return to service.
Create safe access to the work.
Move rolling stock precisely and recover it when operations break down.
Restore geometry, control wear and extend useful life.
Specify railway-specific components for the vehicle and its operating environment.
Connected driver, station and control-room simulation from D&T / SHRail, with portable, immersive VR and mobile configurations for railway training.Simulasi terhubung D&T / SHRail untuk pelatihan masinis, stasiun, dan ruang kendali, dengan konfigurasi portabel, VR imersif, dan berbasis kendaraan.
Use measurement and inspection when the first uncertainty is condition: load distribution, wheel geometry, hidden defects, track geometry, clearance, rail profile or network diagnostics.
Use test systems when a maintenance or production decision depends on force, movement, pressure, electrical capacity or repeatable acceptance evidence.
Use depot equipment when the maintenance problem is physical access, lifting, bogie exchange, heavy component handling or elevated work.
Routine shunting, depot transfer and incident recovery are different movement problems. Keep them separate.
Use maintenance technologies when the objective is controlled material removal, friction management, rail treatment or fleet cleaning rather than immediate asset replacement.
Use railway-specific components when geometry alone is not enough and the component's material, dynamic or fire/smoke behavior matters to operation.
CBP narrows technology in layers. This helps customers navigate the portfolio while keeping railway equipment selection tied to the actual operating and technical requirement.
| Stage | Customer question | What becomes clear |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Operating need | What are we trying to measure, test, move, restore or replace? | The correct solution family. |
| 2 · Mechanism | What physical or operational mechanism creates the problem? | Which technology approach is relevant. |
| 3 · Product family | Which architecture fits the workflow? | The likely principal and product family. |
| 4 · Engineering inputs | What vehicle, site, load, geometry, standard or test data changes the answer? | The actual configuration and hard constraints. |
| 5 · Technical confirmation | Does the proposed configuration fit the real application? | OEM-backed technical route and project-specific specification. |
Railway-specific flooring supplied into Indonesian rolling-stock production, demonstrating why the floor system, installation method and lifecycle matter together.
VIEW GERFLOR →FAT, commissioning, training and practical vehicle measurement show how direct brake-force evidence moves from equipment into workshop use.
VIEW NET-AUTOMATION →Commuter, airport-transit, national-rail and heavy-maintenance references show the difference between routine shunting and mainline traction.
VIEW ZEPHIR →Use the Railway Navigator to describe the operating issue in plain language and narrow the technical path.
OPEN RAILWAY NAVIGATORGo directly to the principal atlas and see product families, differentiation, selection logic and project evidence.